#SONICWALL ANALYZER POSTGRES VS MYSQL SOFTWARE#

It's astonishing how expensive good DBAs are and they are worth every cent. If it really matters, test your application against both.' And if you really, really care, you get in two DBAs (one who specializes in each database) and get them to tune the crap out of the databases, and then choose. So if your decision factor is, ' which is faster?' Then the answer is 'it depends. It goes on to link to a number of performance comparisons, because these things are very. PostgreSQL is relatively slow at low concurrency levels, but scales well with increasing load levels, while providing enough isolation between concurrent accesses to avoid slowdowns at high write/read ratios. On the other hand, it exhibits low scalability with increasing loads and write/read ratios. There's this discussion addressing your 'better' questionĪpparently, according to this web page, MySQL is fast when concurrent access levels are low, and when there are many more reads than writes. PostgreSQL is a much more mature product. MySQL is much more commonly provided by web hosts.

#SONICWALL ANALYZER POSTGRES VS MYSQL SOFTWARE#

Software can change rapidly from version to version, so before you go choosing a DBMS based on the advice below, do some research to see if it's still accurate. That's nearly 11 years ago as of this edit. A note to future readers: The text below was last edited in August 2008.

Sonicwall analyzer postgres vs mysql